S.V., E.J., L.A. Working out of database structure for biobanks
Abstract
Collection, preprocessing and use of biological samples cause many organizational problems, which are successfully resolved with help of biobanks. Among the components of successful work of biobank is a practical, functional and reliable database for storage of information. In the paper, principals and problems of database development for biobanks are considered, taking as example the biobank of the Institute of Medical genetics SB RAMS.
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Federal Target Program “Kadry” on 2009 - 2013 (The contract no. P722 from 12.08.2009).
About the Authors
S. V. Bujkin
Institute of Medical genetics Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tomsk, 634050 fax:(3822)51‐37‐44
E. J. Bragina
Institute of Medical genetics Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tomsk, 634050 fax:(3822)51‐37‐44
L. A. Koneva
Institute of Medical genetics Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tomsk, 634050 fax:(3822)51‐37‐44
References
1. Bragina E.J. Influence of control sample size on significance of associations of genetic markers with development of multifactorial diseases / E.J. Bragina, S.V. Buikin // Jakut Medical Journal. – 2009. – №2 (26). – P. 142-144.
2. Bragina E.J. Biobanks: problems and perspectives of their use in genetic studies of human common diseases / E.J. Bragina, S.V. Buikin, V.P. Puzyrev // Medical Genetics. – 2009. – №3. – P. 20-27.
3. Ingasimutu S. Principles of bioinformatics. - Izhevsk: SRC «Regular and chaotic dynamics», Institute of computer research, 2007. - 320 p.
4. Introduction to databases. The manual / I.P. Karpova.- M: Publishing house MGIEM, 2005. - 96 p.
5. Kusnetsov S.D. Basics of modern databases, information-analytical materials / S.D. Kusnetsov // http://citforum.ru/database/osbd/contents.shtml. - 2008
6. The Federal law 7/27/2006 N 152-FZ (red. by 12/27/2009) “About personal data” // The Russian newspaper. - 2006. - №165.
7. Feero W.G., Guttmacher A.E. Genomewide Association Studies and assessment of the risk of disease // N Engl J Med. – 2010. – V. 363. – P. 166 -176.
8. Frazier L., Sparks E., Sanner J.E. Biobanks and biomarker research in cardiovascular disease // J Cardiovasc Nurs. – 2008. – V. 23(2). – P. 153-158.
9. Gottweis H., Zatloukal K. Biobank governance: trends and perspectives // Pathobiology. – 2007. – V.74(4). – P. 206-211.
10. Little J., Higgins J.P.T., Ioannidis J.P.A. Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement // Hum.Genet. – 2009. – V. 125. – P. 131-151.
11. Shickle D. The consent problem within DNA biobanks // Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. – 2006. – V.37(3). – P. 503-519.
12. Swede H., Stone C.L., Norwood A.R. National population-based biobanks for genetic research // Genetics in Medicine. – 2007. – V.9(3). – P. 141-149.
13. The Wellcome trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14000 cases of seven common diseases and 3000 shared controls // Nature. - 2007. – V. 447. – P. 661-678.
Review
For citations:
Bujkin S.V., Bragina E.J., Koneva L.A. S.V., E.J., L.A. Working out of database structure for biobanks. Yakut Medical Journal. 2011;(1):71-73.
Views:
30
Email this article 