Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage in patients after surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review
https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2025.90.23
Abstract
This systematic literature review analyzes the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Based on 42 studies, key risk predictors for AL were identified. The incidence of AL in the studies included in this review ranged from 2,8% to 24,7%. The introduction of the RALAR scale significantly improved the objective assessment of AL risk. A comprehensive approach to prevention, based on risk stratification and treatment personalization, can significantly improve the outcomes of surgical treatment for colorectal cancer.
About the Authors
I. A. ShamanovRussian Federation
B. S. Dombaanai
Russian Federation
References
1. Analysis of factors influencing colorectal anastomotic leakage: a retrospective study / L.O. Polishchuk, F.P. Vetshev, K.N. Petrenko [et al.] // Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Academician B.V. Petrovsky Journal. 2021. Vol. 9, No. 1. P. 37–44. doi: 10.33029/2308-1198-2021-9-1-37-44.
2. Anufrieva E.V., Demidov D.A., Chekasina E.S. Project approach to organizing colorectal cancer screening as a basis for improving public health // Health of Population and Habitat. 2023. Vol. 31, No. 11. P. 7–14. doi: 10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-11-7-14.
3. Evsyutina Yu.V., Drapkina O.M. Most effective colorectal cancer screening strategies // Preventive Medicine. 2019. Vol. 22, No. 1. P. 105–108. doi: 10.17116/profmed201922011105.
4. Colorectal anastomotic leakage: risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, treatment tactics / M.F. Cherkasov, A.V. Dmitriev, V.S. Groshilin [et al.] // Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2019. Vol. 29, No. 2. P. 27–34. doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2019-29-2-27-34.
5. Prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage by strengthening the anastomosis (results of a randomized trial) / A.A. Balkarov, M.V. Alekseev, E.G. Rybakov [et al.] //surgery. N.I. Pirogov Journal. 2021. No. 7. P. 18-23.
6. Role of transanal drainage in low anterior resection for rectal cancer / F.Sh. Ahmetzyanov, V.I. Egorov, D.M.ruvinsky [et al.] // Kazan Medical Journal. 2021. Vol. 102, No. 3. P. 335–341. doi: 10.17816/KMJ2021-335.
7. Role of colorectal anastomosis level in the development of leakage and ways to improve surgical treatment outcomes of rectal cancer /sh.O. Darbishgadzhiev, A.A. Baulin, N.A. Ivacheva [et al.] // Bulletin of New Medical Technologies. 2020. Vol. 27, No. 1. P. 21–25. doi: 10.24411/1609-2163-2020-16478.
8. A multicentre evaluation of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease /s. Sahami, S.A. Bartels, A. D'Hoore [et al.] //journal of Crohn's & Colitis. 2016. Vol. 10, No. 7. P. 773–778. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv170.
9. A nomogram to predict the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage combining inflammatory-nutritional and abdominal aorta calcium index / Z. Zhang, W. Sun, J. Wang [et al.] // Frontiers in Surgery. 2023. Vol. 9. P. 1008448. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1008448.
10. Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer and construction of a nomogram prediction model / K. Wang, M. Li, R. Liu [et al.] // Cancer Management and Research. 2022. Vol. 14. P. 2243–2252. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S364875.
11. Anastomotic leak risk factors following colon cancer resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis /j. He, M. He, J.H. Tang [et al.] // Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2023. Vol. 408, No. 1. P. 252. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02989-z.
12. Anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: retrospective analysis of risk factors / G. Brisinda, M.M. Chiarello, G. Pepe [et al.] // World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2022. Vol. 10, No. 36. P. 13321–13336. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13321.
13. Anastomotic tension “Bridging”: a risk factor for anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection / R. Ito, H. Matsubara, R. Shimizu [et al.] //surgical Endoscopy. 2024. Vol. 38. P. 4916–4925. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11008-1.
14. Anemia can predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer in the pre-operative stage: a retrospective analysis / R. Gvirtzman, D.M. Livovsky, E. Tahover [et al.] // World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2021. Vol. 19. P. 341. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02452-7.
15. Anterior resection for rectal cancer and visceral blood flow: an explorative study / M.rutegård, N. Hassmén, O. Hemmingsson [et al.] //scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2016. Vol. 105, No. 2. P. 78–83. doi: 10.1177/1457496915593692.
16. Association between intraoperative blood glucose and anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery / M. Reudink, M. van Dieren, W. Bemelman [et al.] //journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2021. Vol. 25, No. 10. P. 2619–2627. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04933-2.
17. Blood cell count indexes as predictors of anastomotic leakage in elective colorectal surgery: a multicenter study on 1432 patients / P. Paliogiannis, M. Fancellu, G. Cossu [et al.] // World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2020. Vol. 18, No. 1. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01856-1.
18. Cancer statistics, 2022 / R.L. Siegel, K.D. Miller, H.E. Fuchs [et al.] // CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2022. Vol. 72, No. 1. P. 7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708.
19. Carus T., Pick P. Intraoperative fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery [Intraoperative Fluoreszenzangiographie in der kolorektalen Chirurgie] // Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift für alle Gebiete der operativen Medizin. 2019. Vol. 90, No. 11. P. 887–890. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-01042-4.
20. Charlson comorbidity index predicts anastomotic leakage in patients with resected right-sided colon cancer / H. Wada, T. Tominaga, T. Nonaka [et al.] //surgery Today. 2022. Vol. 52, No. 5. P. 804–811. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02472-0.
21. Cigarette smoke modifies neutrophil chemotaxis, neutrophil extracellular trap formation and inflammatory response-related gene expression / P.C. White, J. Hirschfeld, M.R. Milward [et al.] //journal of Periodontal Research. 2018. Vol. 53, No. 4. P. 525–535. doi: 10.1111/jre.12542.
22. Colon cancer surgery: does preoperative blood transfusion influence short-term postoperative outcomes? / N. Tamini, G. Deghi, L. Gianotti [et al.] //journal of Investigative Surgery. 2021. Vol. 34, No. 9. P. 974–978. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1731634.
23. Danardono E., Hana N., Sahudi S. Hemoglobin level and albumin as a predictive factor for anastomotic leakage following after hemicolectomy: a prospective study for colon cancer //journal of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry Research. 2024. Vol. 6, No. 9. P. 1460–1468. doi: 10.48309/jmpcr.2024.447094.1135.
24. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer / N.N. Rahbari, J. Weitz, W. Hohenberger [et al.] //surgery. 2010. Vol. 147, No. 3. P. 339–351. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012.
25. Defunctioning stomas may reduce chances of a stoma-free outcome after anterior resection for rectal cancer / K. Holmgren, J. Häggström, M.M. Haapamäki [et al.] // Colorectal Disease. 2021. Vol. 23, No. 11. P. 2859–2869. doi: 10.1111/codi.15836.
26. Determining the protective characteristics and risk factors for the development of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer / N. Suzuki, S. Yoshida, S. Tomochika [et al.] //surgery Today. 2021. Vol. 51, No. 5. P. 713–720. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02133-0.
27. Diabetes mellitus and risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis /s.J. Li, Z.Q. Wang, Y.J. Li [et al.] // Diseases of the Esophagus. 2017. Vol. 30, No. 6. P. 1–12. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox006.
28. Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / K. Phan, L. Oh, G. Ctercteko [et al.] //journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 2019. Vol. 10, No. 2. P. 179–187. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.11.07.
29. Does nutritional status affect treatment tolerability, response and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients? Results of a prospective multicenter study /s. Karabulut, O. Karabulut, A. Yalcin [et al.] // Research Square. 2020. doi: 10.21203/rs.2.22409/v1.
30. Effect of different reinforcement methods on anastomotic leakage prevention after laparoscopic double anastomosis / T.Y. Jiang, L. Zang, F. Dong [et al.] //journal of Surgical Oncology. 2021. Vol. 123, Suppl. 1. P. S81–S87. doi: 10.1002/jso.26333.
31. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer / Y. Inoue, A. Kawamoto, Y. Okugawa [et al.] // Molecular and Clinical Oncology. 2015. Vol. 3, No. 4. P. 897–901. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.530.
32. Evaluating the predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after total laparoscopic resection with transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction for colorectal cancer /s. Zhou, W. Pei, Z. Li [et al.] // Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2020. Vol. 16, No. 6. P. 326–332. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13372.
33. Evidence according to Cochrane systematic reviews on alterable risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery / B. Wallace, F. Schuepbach, S. Gaukel [et al.] // Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2020. Vol. 2020. P. 9057963. doi: 10.1155/2020/9057963.
34. Facteurs prédictifs de fistule anastomotique après colectomie pour cancer [Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery] / A. Zouari, A. Masmoudi, F. Khanfir [et al.] // The Pan African Medical Journal. 2022. Vol. 42. P. 129. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.129.33570.
35. Favuzza J. Risk factors for anastomotic leak, consideration for proximal diversion, and appropriate use of drains // Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2021. Vol. 34, No. 6. P. 366–370. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735266.
Review
For citations:
Shamanov I.A., Dombaanai B.S. Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage in patients after surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review. Yakut Medical Journal. 2025;(2):104-111. https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2025.90.23