Sacrum with five pairs of sacral openings as a pathognomonic symptom of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae
https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2025.90.07
Abstract
Clinical experience shows that during radiological examination of the pelvis, patients are often diagnosed with a sacrum with five pairs of sacral openings, while normally there should be four. Purpose: To which form of dysplasia should cases of diagnosis of the sacrum with five pairs of sacral openings be attributed. The clinical material for the study was the results of computed tomography of the lower lumbar spine and pelvic bones in 78 patients who were diagnosed with a sacrum with five pairs of sacral openings. The CT examination of the patients was carried out on a 128-slice «General Electric» device. The study established that the analyzed group of 78 patients was heterogeneous and consisted of two subgroups. Patients of the first subgroup (52 (66.7%) patients) had fused upper sacral vertebrae by transverse processes to the left and right of the sacral crest. Patients of the second subgroup (26 (33.3%) patients) had similar bone fusion of two upper sacral vertebrae on one side, there was no such concrescence on the contralateral side, and synchondrosis was clearly defined. The presence of such a bright radial symptom of sacral pathology as five pairs of sacral openings allows for timely diagnosis of cases of transitional lumbosacral vertebrae, informing patients about the nature of the disease, and, if necessary, prescribing therapy adequate to the severity of the condition.
About the Author
E. G. SkryabinRussian Federation
References
1. Leonova O.N., Nazarenko A.G., Baykov E.S., Kuzmin N.S., Balychev G.E., Krutko A.V. Neuropathic pain syndrome during surgical interventions on the lumbar spine // N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2024; Vol. 31, No. 2: 173−182. doi:10.17816/vto624385
2. Skryabin E.G., Kicherova O.A., Zotov P.B. Main clinical characteristics of pain in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae // S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024; Vol. 124, No 5: 7-13. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20241240517.
3. Skryabin E.G., Romanenko D.A., Evstropova Yu.V. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: prevalence of different types and subtypes of pathology (literature review) // Siberian Medical Review. 2025; No. 1: 13-22. doi:10.20333/bs.ctdb.2024.02.011.
4. Korotaevsky E.A., Kalinin E.G., Butyrskaya I.D. [et al.]Comparative analysis of the incidence of dorsopathies in the adult population in the Russian Federation and in individual subjects of the Northwestern Federal District for 2013-2022 // Problems of social hygiene, health care and history of medicine. 2024; Vol. 32 No. 6: 1254-1258. doi:10.32687-866X-2024-32-6-1254-1258.
5. Bhagchandani C., Murugan C., Arumugam S. Sukumaran [et al.]. A Whole-Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Cross-Sectional Study of the Clinicoradiological Association of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra with Degenerative Disc Disease, End Plate Degeneration, Low Back Pain, and Facet Tropism. World Neurosurg. 2024;185:1121-1128. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.032.
6. Castellvi AE., Goldstein LA., Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar V extradural defects. Spine. 1984;9:493-495. doi:10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014.
7. Chen K.-T., Chen C.-M. Anatomy and Pathologu of the L5 Exiting Nerve in the Lumbosacral Spine //j Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech. 2025;10(1):37-41. doi: 10.21182/jmisst.2024.01249.
8. Dual-energy CT in diagnosing sacral fractures: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and intraand inter-rater reliabilities / T. Oda, S. Kitada, H. Hirase [et al.]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025:51(1):35. doi:10.1007/s00068-024-02673-x
9. Kapetanakis S., Gkoumousian K., Gkantsinikoudis N. [et al.]. Functional outcomes of microdiskectomy in Bertolotti syndrome: the relationship between lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study in Greece. Asian Spine J. 2025;19(1):94-101. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0213.
10. García López A., Herrero Ezquerro M.T., Martínez Pérez M. Risk factor analysis of persistent back pain after microdyscectomy: A retrospective study. Heliyon. 2024;10(19):38549. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38549.
11. Raj P., Kumar B. A Morphometric Evaluation of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: An Observational Study. Int J Curr Pharm Rev & Res. 2024;16(5):308-311.
12. Sagtas E., Peker H. Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra on lumbar CT and associated degenerative imaging findings in symptomatic patients. Pam Tip Derg. 2025;18(4):3.
13. Wellik DM. Hox-genes and patterning the vertebrate body. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2024;159:1-27. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.011.
Review
For citations:
Skryabin E.G. Sacrum with five pairs of sacral openings as a pathognomonic symptom of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Yakut Medical Journal. 2025;(2):33-36. https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2025.90.07