Acute endothelial cell injury in cardiac surgery patients under artificial blood circulation: the current state of the problem
https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2024.87.21
Abstract
The aim of this study is to summarize studies conducted over the past decades on endothelial damage in cardiac surgery patients who underwent surgical interventions with artificial blood circulation. We searched and analyzed literature on endothelial dysfunction in various medical databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Elibrary, and Cyberleninka. In addition to medical aspects, our literature review covers historical aspects of the research of endothelial function and dysfunction. We suggest that pathological processes in endothelium during surgery and postoperative period predict adverse treatment outcomes, and therefore should be taken into account by anesthesiologists, resuscitators, cardiac surgeons and transfusiologists. Anaesthetists, cardiologists and transfusionists should take this pathological condition into account during surgical interventions and in the postoperative period due to possible negative impact on treatment outcomes
About the Authors
M. Yu. KislitsynaRussian Federation
Kislitsyna Marina Yu. – student
A. V. Mikhailenko
Russian Federation
Mikhailenko Anna V. – student
E. G. Gavrilova
Russian Federation
Gavrilova Elena G. – MD, PhD in Medicine, Associate Professor of Anesthesi ology and Intensive Care Department, Head of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department No. 2 of the RCC of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Head of Intensive Care Department of the COVID Treatment MC
References
1. Averina T.B. Extracorporeal circulation. // Annals of surgery. 2013. No.2. P. 5-12.
2. Boсkeria L.A., Milievskaya E.B., Skopin A.I. Cardiovascular surgery. Extracorporeal circulation in Russian Federation – 2018. // Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019. V. 61(4). P. 255–264. doi: 10.24022/0236-2791-2019-61-4-255-264
3. Vasina L.V., Vlasov T.D., Petrishchev N.N. Functional heterogeneity of the endothelium (the review). Arterial hypertension. 2017. V. 23(2). P. 88-102. doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2017-23-2-88-102
4. Vasina L.V., Petrishchev N.N., Vlasov T.D. Markers of endothelial dysfunction. // Regional blood circulation and microcirculation. 2017. V16 (1). P. 4–15. doi: 10.24884/1682-6655-2017-16-1-4-15.
5. Vlasov T.D., Nesterovich I.I., Shimanski D.A. Endothelial dysfunction: from the particular to the general. Return to the «Old Paradigm»? // Regional blood circulation and microcirculation. 2019; 18(2). P.19–27. doi: 10.24884/16826655-2019-18-2-19-27.
6. Kornev V.I., Kalinina N.M., Startseva O.N. Effect of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on endothelial dysfunction in cardiac surgery patients. // Kazan medical journal. 2020. V. 101(2). P. 279–283. doi: 10.17816/KMJ2020-279.
7. Complex evaluation of endothelial dysfuncion markers for prediction of outcomes in coronary surgery. / Mikheev S.L. [et al.] // Clinical medicine. 2017. V.95(11). P. 1026-1034. doi.org/10.18821/0023-2149-2017-95-11-1026-1034
8. The role of markers of endothelial dysfunction in predicting the outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. / Mikheev S.L. [et al.]. // Abstracts of the IV Eurasian Congress of Cardiologists / 2016. No. 3. P. 155-156.
9. The multiple organ failure syndrome after cardiac surgery with artificial blood circulation. / Babaev M.A. [et al.] // Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2013. No. 2. P. 119-123.
10. Comparison of pulsating and non-pulsating modes of artificial blood circulation during coronary artery bypass surgery. /shiganov M. Yu. [et al.] // Bulletin of surgery. 2008. №.4. P. 26-29.
11. Shlyk I.F. Cytokine profile and endothelial condition in patients with coronary artery disease and different outcomes of coronary bypass surgery. // Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2019. V. 26. N.5. P. 96-104 doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2019-26-5-96-104.
12. Endothelial dysfunction and methods of its determination/ Martynov A. I. [et al.] // RKZH. 2005. No. 4.
13. The endothelial glycocalyx: research methods and prospects for their use in endothelial dysfunction assessment.Vlasov T. D. [et al.] // Regional blood circulation and microcirculation. 2020. V. 19, No. 1. P. 5-16. doi: 10.24884/1682-6655-2020-19-1-5-16.
14. Yakubtsevich, R. E., Krotkov K.O. Modern possibilities of drug correction of endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease in the intraoperative and early postoperative period after myocardial revascularization // Journal of Grodno State Medical University. 2022. V. 20, No. 1. P. 13-20. https://doi.org/10.25298/2221-8785-2022-20-1-13-20.
15. A prospective, randomized study of endothelin and postoperative recovery in off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass surgery./ Dorman B. H. [et al.] // Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2004. V.18(1).P. 25–29. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2003.10.005
16. Cardiopulmonary bypass and internal thoracic artery: Can roller or centrifugal pumps change vascular reactivity of the graft? The IPITA study: A randomized controlled clinical trial./ Fouquet O. [et al.] //PLOS ONE 2020. V.15(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235604
17. comparison between the Effects of Bretschneider's HTK Solution and Cold Blood Cardioplegia on Systemic Endothelial Functions in Patients who Undergo Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Prospective Randomized and Controlled Trial./Mercan I.[et al.]// Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2020 V.1;35(5):634-643. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0327.
18. Correlation between acute degradation of the endothelial glycocalyx and microcirculation dysfunction during cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery. /Qiaolin W. [et al.]// Microvascular Research 2019. V. 124(37–42),. doi:10.1016/j.mvr.2019.02.004]
19. Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on function and viability of circulating endothelial progenitor cells./Ruel M. [et al.]// J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005 V.130(3):633-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.01.013.
20. Endothelial-Dependent Vasomotor Dysfunction in Infants After Cardiopulmonary Bypass./Krispinsky L.T. [et al.] // Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 V.21(1):42-49. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002049
21. High Preoperative Serum Syndecan-1, a Marker of Endothelial Glycocalyx Degradation, and Severe Acute Kidney Injury after Valvular Heart Surgery./ Kim H.B. [et al.] // J Clin Med. V. 2020 Jun 10;9(6):1803. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061803.
22. Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with in vitro endothelial hyperpermeability and increased angiopoietin-2 levels./ Dekker N. [et al]. // Crit Care. 2019. №117. doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2418-5.
23. Microvascular Alterations During Cardiac Surgery Using a Heparin or Phosphorylcholine-Coated Circuit. / Dekker N. [et al.] // Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia V. 34. 2019. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.012
24. Perturbation of the microvascular glycocalyx and perfusion in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass. / C. Nussbaum [et al.] // The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2015. V. 150(6). P.1474-1481. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.050.
25. Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Bypass is Associated With Endothelial Glycocalyx Degradation./Robich M. [et al.]// J. Surg. Res. 2020 V. 251:287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.02.011.
26. Reduced Systemic Nitric Oxide Bioavailability Parallels Microvascular Endothelial Dysfunction during Cardiopulmonary Bypass./Ugenti V. [et al.]// Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2021 V.117(3):554-7
27. Reduction of vascular leakage by imatinib is associated with preserved microcirculatory perfusion and reduced renal injury in a rat model of cardiopulmonary bypass./Koning N.J.[et al.] //Br. J. Anaesth. 2018 V. 120(6):1165–75.
28. Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction during Cardiac Surgery: On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary Surgery. / Brettner F. [et al.] // Eur Surg Res. 2017. V.58(5-6). P. 354-368. doi: 10.1159/000480431.
29. Vasculotide, an angiopoietin-1 mimetic, reduces pulmonary vascular leakage and preserves microcirculatory perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass in rats. / Dekker N. [et al.] // Br J Anaesth. 2018. V.121(5). P. 1041-1051. doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.049
Review
For citations:
Kislitsyna M.Yu., Mikhailenko A.V., Gavrilova E.G. Acute endothelial cell injury in cardiac surgery patients under artificial blood circulation: the current state of the problem. Yakut Medical Journal. 2024;(3):104-108. https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2024.87.21