Preview

Yakut Medical Journal

Advanced search

Diagnosis and treatment of ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding

https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2021.75.12

Abstract

Ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding remains an urgent problem in emergency surgery. This literature review presents modern data on gastroduodenal bleeding of ulcerative etiology. The review considers the issues of epidemiology and etiology, as well as diagnosis and treatment of ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding.

About the Authors

A. Ya. Ilkanich
Surgut State University
Russian Federation

Ilkanich Andrey Yanoshevich – M.D., Professor, the Department of Surgical Diseases, Medical Institute



V. V. Darvin
Surgut State University
Russian Federation

Darvin Vladimir Vasilyevich – M.D., Professor, Head of the Department of Surgical Diseases



M. G. Ryzhikov
Nizhnevartovsk Regional Clinical Hospita
Russian Federation

Ryzhikov Mikhail Grigorievich – Head of the endoscopy department, endoscopist



A. V. Oganian
Nizhnevartovsk Regional Clinical Hospital; Surgut State University
Russian Federation

Oganian Armen Valerievich – Endoscopist;

Postgraduate of the Department of Surgical Diseases, Medical Institute



References

1. Bogdanovich A.V. The structure and tactics of treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding / A.V. Bogdanovich, V.N. Shilenok, E.Ia. Zeldin // Vitebsk State Medical University Herald. – 2016. – Т. 15. – No 3. – P. 40-46.

2. Valeev M.V. Gastroduodenal bleedings. Treatment results analysis in a district hospital / M.V. Valeev, Sh.V. Timerbulatov // N.I. Pirogov’s National Medical and Surgical Center Herald. – 2020. – Т.15. – No 1. – P. 39-42. DOI: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2020.61.63.007

3. Diagnostics and treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute cerebral circulation accident / M.P. Korolev [et al.] // Pediatrician. – 2019. – Т. 10. – No 5. – P. 43–50. DOI: 10.17816/PED10543-50

4. Russian Surgeons Society. Ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. Clinical guidelines. Moscow – Voronezh. – 2014.

5. Comparative assessment of recurrence of gastroduodenal ulcerative bleeding forecast systems / N.V. Lebedev [et al.] // Surgery. The Journal named after N.I. Pirogov. – 2013. – No. 8. – P. 28-31.

6. Surgical treatment strategy for ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding / M.S. Kunafin [et al.] // Biological sciences. – P. 97.

7. Endoscopic hemostasis in cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding / A.V. Kuznetsov [et al.] // Interdisciplinary aspects of multidisciplinary clinic: diagnosis, treatment, prevention. – 2018. – P. 72-78.

8. Arima S. et al. Evaluation of hemostasis with soft coagulation using endoscopic hemostatic forceps in comparison with metallic hemoclips for bleeding gastric ulcers: a prospective, randomized trial // Journal of gastroenterology. – 2010. – Т. 45. – №. 5. – P. 501-505. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-009-0186-8

9. Baracat F. et al. Endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials // Surgical endoscopy. – 2016. – Т. 30. – №. 6. – P. 2155-2168. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4542-x

10. Bardou M. et al. Newer endoscopic therapies decrease both re-bleeding and mortality in high-risk patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding: A series of meta-analyses // Gastroenterology. – 2003. – Т. 124. – №. 4. – P. A239. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)81201-5

11. Changela K. et al. Hemostatic powder spray: a new method for managing gastrointestinal bleeding // Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology. – 2015. – Т. 8. – №. 3. – P. 125-135. DOI: 0.1177/1756283X15572587

12. Chung W.C. et al. Clinical characteristics of Helicobacter pylori-negative drug-negative peptic ulcer bleeding // World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. – 2015. – Т. 21. – №. 28. – P. 8636. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8636

13. Daram S. et al. A Double Blind Randomized Study to Evaluate the Use of Metoclopramide before Endoscopy for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding // American Journal of Gastroenterology. – 2010. – T. 105. – P. 508

14. Fujishiro M. et al. Guidelines for endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding // Digestive Endoscopy. – 2016. – Т. 28. – №. 4. – P. 363-378. DOI: 10.1111/den.12639

15. Gill K. R.S., Pooley R.A., Wallace M. B. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of endoclips // Gastrointestinal endoscopy. – 2009. – Т. 70. – №. 3. – P. 532-536. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.024

16. Gisbert J.P., Abraira V. Accuracy of Helicobacter pylori diagnostic tests in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis // American Journal of Gastroenterology. – 2006. – Т. 101. – №. 4. – P. 848-863.

17. Gralnek I. et al. Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline // Endoscopy. – 2015. – Т. 47. – №. 10. – P. a1-46-a46.

18. Grund K.E., Storek D., Farin G. Endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) first clinical experiences in flexible endoscopy // Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies. – 1994. – Т. 2. – №. 1. – P. 42-46.

19. Hébuterne X., Vanbiervliet G. Feeding the patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding // Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care. – 2011. – Т. 14. – №. 2. – P. 197-201. DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283436dc5

20. Jensen D.M. et al. Reassessment of rebleeding risk of Forrest IB (oozing) peptic ulcer bleeding in a large international randomized trial // The American journal of gastroenterology. – 2017. – Т. 112. – №. 3. – P. 441. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.582

21. Kaminskis A. et al. Endoscopic hemostasis followed by preventive transarterial embolization in high-risk patients with bleeding peptic ulcer: 5-year experience // World Journal of Emergency Surgery. – 2019. – Т. 14. – №. 1. – P. 1-6. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0264-z

22. Karstensen J.G. et al. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) cascade guideline // Endoscopy international open. – 2018. – Т. 6. – №. 10. – P. E1256.

23. Khoshbaten M. et al. Effects of early oral feeding on relapse and symptoms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in peptic ulcer disease // Digestive endoscopy. – 2013. – Т. 25. – №. 2. – P. 125-129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01347.x

24. Laine L. Bipolar-multipolar electrocoagulation of bleeding ulcers // Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics. – 1991. – Т. 1. – №. 2. – P. 291-302.

25. Laine L., McQuaid K.R. Endoscopic therapy for bleeding ulcers: an evidence-based approach based on meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials // Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. – 2009. – Т. 7. – №. 1. – P. 33-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.016

26. Marshall B.J., Warren J.R. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration // The lancet. – 1984. – Т. 323. – №. 8390. – P. 1311-1315.

27. Mokhtare M. et al. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding // Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology. – 2016. – Т. 9. – P. 337. DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S114860

28. Odutayo A. et al. Restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials // The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. – 2017. – Т. 2. – №. 5. – P. 354-360. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30054-7

29. Roy A. et al. The clinical and cost implications of failed endoscopic hemostasis in gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding // United European gastroenterology journal. – 2017. – Т. 5. – №. 3. – P. 359-364. DOI: 10.1177/2050640616663570

30. Siau K. et al. Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update for the general physician // Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. – 2017. – Т. 47. – №. 3. – P. 219. DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2017.303

31. Stanley A.J. et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study // bmj. – 2017. – Т. 356. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6432

32. Szary N.M. et al. Erythromycin prior to endoscopy in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis // Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. – 2011. – Т. 46. – №. 7-8. – P. 920-924. DOI:10.3109/00365521.2011.568520

33. Tsoi K.K.F., Hirai H.W., Sung J.J.Y. Meta-analysis: comparison of oral vs. intravenous proton pump inhibitors in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding // Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. – 2013. – Т. 38. – №. 7. – P. 721-728. DOI: 10.1111/apt.12441

34. Vergara M. et al. Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high-risk bleeding ulcers // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. – 2014. – №. 10. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005584.pub3

35. Villanueva C. et al. Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding // New England Journal of Medicine. – 2013. – Т. 368. – №. 1. – P. 11-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211801

36. Wang J. et al. Restrictive vs liberal transfusion for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. – 2013. – Т. 19. – №. 40. – P. 6919. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6919

37. Wong T.C.L. et al. A comparison of angiographic embolization with surgery after failed endoscopic hemostasis to bleeding peptic ulcers // Gastrointestinal endoscopy. – 2011. – Т. 73. – №. 5. – P. 900-908. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.024


Review

For citations:


Ilkanich A.Ya., Darvin V.V., Ryzhikov M.G., Oganian A.V. Diagnosis and treatment of ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. Yakut Medical Journal. 2021;(3):46-50. https://doi.org/10.25789/YMJ.2021.75.12

Views: 20


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1813-1905 (Print)
ISSN 2312-1017 (Online)