Influence of Implant-Retained Denture on Quality of Life of Patients with Partial or Complete Tooth Loss
Abstract
The literature review on implant supported removable prosthetics is presented in this article. Different authors’ views are described concerning the problem of implant - retained denture and its effect on patients’ quality of life, the results of their study are analyzed as well.
About the Authors
A. V. Lazarenko
Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after. Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lazarenko Anna Valeryevna, PhD student of the Department of Medical management of the Institute of postgraduate education
1, Partizan Zeleznyak str., 660022, Krasnoyarsk
V. V. Kan
Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after. Prof. V.F. Voino Yasenetsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kan Vsevolod Vladimirovich, associate professor of the Department of stomatology of the Institute of postgraduate education, Candidate of Medicine
1, Partizan Zeleznyak str., 660022, Krasnoyarsk
References
1. A randomized controlled trial of implantretained mandibular overdentures / P. Allen, J. Thomason, N. Jepson [et al.] // J Dent Res. – 2006. – Vol. 85(6). – P.547-551.
2. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures / R. Timmerman, G.T. Stoker, D. Wismeijer [et al.] // J Dental Res. – 2004. – Vol. 83(8). – P.630-3.
3. Association between perceived chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life in partially dentate patients / M. Inukai, M.T. John,Y. Igarashi [et al.] // Health Qual Life Outcomes. – 2010. – Vol. 8. – P. 118.
4. Bergendal T. Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study / T. Bergendal, B. Engquist // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 1998. – Vol. 13(2). – P.253-62.
5. Differences in impact of patient and prosthetic characteristics on oral health-related quality of life among implant-retained overdenture wearers / A. Preciado, J. Del Río, M.J. SuárezGarcía [et al.] // J Dent. – 2012. – Vol. 40(10). – P.857-65.
6. Geckili O. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of three-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year retrospective study /O. Geckili, H. Bilhan, E. Mumcu // Quintessence Int. – 2011. – Vol. 42(9). – P.721-8.
7. Geckili O. Impact of mandibular two-implant retained overdentures on life quality in a group of elderly Turkish edentulous patients / O. Geckili, H. Bilhan, T. Bilgin // Arch Geront Geriatr. – 2011. – Vol. 53(2). – P.233-6.
8. Impacts of implant treatment on daily living / M.K. Al-Omiri, O.A. Hammad , E. Lynch [et al.] // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2011. – Vol. 26(4). – P.877-86.
9. Implant overdentures and nutrition: a randomized controlled trial / M.A. Awad, J.A. Morais, S. Wollin [et al.] // J Dent Res. – 2012. – Vol. 91(1). – P.39-46.
10. McEntee M.I. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results / M.I. McEntee, J.N. Walton, N. Glick // J Prosthet Dent. – 2005. – Vol. 93(1). – P.28-37.
11. Nicolae V. The impact of implant treatment on oral health related quality of life in a private dental practice: a prospective cohort study / V. Nicolae // AMT. – 2013. – Vol. 2(4). – P.293-294.
12. Oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients: assessments before and after implant therapy / Y.J. Nickenig, M. Wichmann, S.K. Andreas [et al.] // J Craniomaxillofac Surg. – 2008. – Vol. 36(8). – P.477-80.
13. Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments / T. Cheng, G. Sun, J. Huo [et al.] // J Dent. – 2012. – Vol. 40(11). – P.1018-23.
14. Satisfaction of patients fitted with implantretained overdentures / J. Balaguer, B. García, M. Peñarrocha [et al.] // Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. – 2011. – Vol. 16(2). – P. 204-9.
15. Sex differences in denture satisfaction / S. Pan, M. Awad, J.M. Thomason [et al.] // J Dent. – 2008. – Vol. 36(5). – P.301-8.
16. Short dental implants: a systematic review / S. Annibali, M.P. Cristalli, D. Dell’aquila [et al.] // J Dent Res. – 2012. – Vol. 91(1). – P. 25-32.
17. Short implants in partially edentuolous maxillae and mandibles: a 10 to 20 years retrospective evaluation / D. Lops, E. Bressan, G. Pisoni [et al.] // Int J Dent. – 2012. – Vol. 2012. – P.351793.
18. Simplified versus comprehensive fabrication of complete dentures: patient ratings of denture satisfaction from a randomized crossover trial / G. Heydecke, M. Vogeler, M. Wolkewitz [et al.] // Quintessence Int. – 2008. – Vol. 39(2). – P.107-16.
19. Stoker G. An Eight-year Follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and costanalysis with three types of mandibular implantretained overdentures / G. Stoker, D. Wismeijer, M. Van Waas // J Dent Res. – 2007. – Vol. 86(3). – P. 276-280.
20. The effect of implant-supported removable partial dentures on oral health quality of life / W.D. Gates, L.F. Cooper, A.E. Sanders [et al.] // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2014. – Vol. 25(2). – P.207- 13.
21. The impact of implant treatment on oral health related quality of life in a private dental practice: a prospective cohort study / M. Fillion, D. Aubazac, M. Bessadet [et al.] // Health Qual Life Outcomes. – 2013. – Vol. 11. – P.197-203.
22. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures - results of preliminary prospective study / S. Harder, S. Wolfart, C. Egert [et al.] // J Dent. – 2011. – Vol. 39(10). – P.656-61.
23. Thomason J.M. The use of mandibular implant-retained overdentures improve patient satisfaction and quality of life / J.M. Thomason // J Evid Based Dent Pract. – 2010. – Vol. 10(1). – P.61-3.
Review
For citations:
Lazarenko A.V., Kan V.V. Influence of Implant-Retained Denture on Quality of Life of Patients with Partial or Complete Tooth Loss. Yakut Medical Journal. 2015;(1):64-66.
Views:
19
Email this article 