Experience of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and choosing a method of drainage
Abstract
We presented experience of performance of 22 laparoscopy pyeloplasty at children. Assessment of duration of operations, postoperative day and complications is carried out. The methods of drainage are analyzed as well.
About the Authors
S. O. Kupryakov
Республиканская больница №1–Национальный центр медицины
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. F. Stepanyuk
Республиканская больница №1–Национальный центр медицины
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Savvina
Республиканская больница №1–Национальный центр медицины
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Grigoriev
Республиканская больница №1–Национальный центр медицины
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. R. Varfolomeev
Медицинский институт СВФУ им. М.К. Аммосова
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. N. Nikolaev
Медицинский институт СВФУ им. М.К. Аммосова
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ya. G. Pavlov
Республиканская больница №1–Национальный центр медицины
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Martov A.G. X-ray endoscopic methods of diagnosis and treatment of kidney and upper urinary tract diseases (supravesical endourology)]: dis. ... MD / A.G. Martov. – M., 1993. – 76 p.
2. Rudin Yu.E. Optimal methods of drainage of the urinary tract after pyeloplasty in children with hydronephrosis / Yu.E. Rudin, A.I. Osipova, Ye.V. Kuznetsova // Pediatric surgery (Rus.). – 2000. – (5). – P. 16-19.
3. Cheskis A.L. Evolution of the kidneys after the operative correction of hydronephrosis / A.L. Cheskis, M.S. Ostapko, A.Ye. Leonovich // Obstructive uropathy in children: materials of the All-Russian symposium of pediatric surgeonsurologists. – Kazan’, 1998. – P. 21.
4. Endovideosurgery of hydronephrosis in children. Equipment. Drainage. Complications / S.G. Vrublevskiy, O.S. Shmyrov, Ye.N. Vrublevskaya [et al.] //Collection of theses of the V Anniversary of the All-Russian School on Pediatric Urology-andrology]. – 2016. – P. 41-42.
5. Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter: A case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. BJU 1949;21(9): 209-214. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1949.tb10773.x
6. Eden C, Gianduzzo T, Chang C, Thiruchelvam N, Jones A. Extraperitoneal laparo-scopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2004;172(6 Pt 1):2308-11.
7. Peters CA1, Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1995;153(6):1962-5.
8. Reed MJ, Williams MPL. Open pyeloplasty in children: experience with an improved stenting technique. Urol Int 2003;71(2):201-3. DOI: 71847.
9. Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M, Nissenkorn I. The indwelling ureteric stent: a ‘friendly’ procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU 2000;85(4):408-11. PMID: 10691815
10. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150(6):1795-9. PMID: 8230507
11. Sibley GNA, Graham MD, Smith ML. Improving splingtage techniques in pyeloplasty. Br J Urol 1987;60(6):489-91.
12. Zaidi Z, Mouriquand PDE. The use of a multipurpose stent in children. Br J Urol 1997;80(5):802-5.
13. Zoeller C, Lacher M, Ure B, Petersen C, Kuebler JF. Double J or transrenal transanastomotic stent in laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: a comparative study and our technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014;24(3):2059. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0338.
Review
For citations:
Kupryakov S.O., Stepanyuk N.F., Savvina V.A., Grigoriev V.A., Varfolomeev A.R., Nikolaev V.N., Pavlov Ya.G. Experience of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and choosing a method of drainage. Yakut Medical Journal. 2017;(4):9-11.
Views:
20
Email this article 